Your first slogan here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Curabitur dapibus nisi faucibus enim. Maecenas nisi turpis, vulputate at.

Read More
Your second slogan here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Curabitur dapibus nisi faucibus enim. Maecenas nisi turpis, vulputate at.

Read More
Your third slogan here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Curabitur dapibus nisi faucibus enim. Maecenas nisi turpis, vulputate at.

Read More

Roger Goodell’s NFL personal conduct policy is a leadership failure

Roger Goodell’s NFL personal conduct policy was destined to fail from the beginning.  So far, 16 players have been suspended since he took over in 2006.  Here is the policy as it is written today.

“While criminal activity is clearly outside the scope of permissible conduct, and persons who engage in criminal activity will be subject to discipline, the standard of conduct for persons employed in the NFL is considerably higher. It is not enough simply to avoid being found guilty of a crime. Instead, as an employee of the NFL or a member club, you are held to a higher standard and expected to conduct yourself in a way that is responsible, promotes the values upon which the League is based, and is lawful.

Persons who fail to live up to this standard of conduct are guilty of conduct detrimental and subject to discipline, even where the conduct itself does not result in conviction of a crime.”

People will ask, how can it be a failure, he has suspended 16 players.  At face value, it seems like it is working.  It is a well thought-out, well-written and well-constructed policy.

Roger Goodell

But that is the problem with policy.  They all seem to be well written and are laden with good intentions.  The other problem is that people confuse these well-written management tools as leadership.

In reality, the NFL gives lip service to high “standards of conduct” and to conduct “that is responsible, promotes the values upon which the League is based.”  Oh yeah, “and is lawful.”

By the way, what are the NFL’s conduct policy’s core “values” based upon?  Are these written somewhere? Do the players, coaches, and owners have access to them? Or are they some floating, randomly assigned group of words and ideals chosen to fit the mood of the commissioner?

You cannot influence the hearts, minds and souls of people through policy making or through the implementation of rules.  Reprimanding; making new management policy; and punishment for mistakes already made is not leadership. They are knee jerk reactions to bad situations and not correcting the deficiencies or underlying problems.

Yes, I realize, these policies are good for bloggers and the punishment dished out makes great headlines and give the perception that the league is doing something.  But, what good is a policy when 99 percent of the players in the NFL followed it anyway?  And for the guys who don’t follow the rules, a new policy or threat of punishment means absolutely nothing.

There is no quick solution, but that is the problem.  Making policy and rules is an easy way out and a quick way to give the perception of action and attention to a problem.

But, it is not a fix. Fixing or mitigating the problem takes a vision and strength beyond what the NFL and Goodell are willing to do.

It takes a leader that has that vision and strength to do some unpopular things. It will take a leader who is willing to build for the future and elicit new action from the entire league.

That means, the leader (commissioner) must convince the coaches, owners and GM’s to be willing to change the face of the NFL.  They will need to look for players who have as much character as athletic ability.

Roger Goodell has to get the league and the owners to change the way they do business. The NFL has to have the courage not to draft and/or completely ban the bad apples in the first place. Then maybe, the message will be sent to the players and the country.

Only when the NFL is willing to pass on some of the best players because of conduct problems will people get the message that the NFL is serious about its image. Change the players and the conduct policy will no longer be needed.

The good news is it looks like the tide is turning.  This year in the NFL draft, character and leadership were looked at equally as athletic ability.

Do you have a personal conduct policy?

Big Ben Roethlisberger, one more reason you should be a role model to your kids

Add another QB to the list of idiots who wants to be a role model to your kids. I had to check twice to make sure I was reading the sports section and I was not reading some political propaganda or The National Enquirer.

Here is what I am talking about, in a column by Fox’s Mark Kriegel. Ben Roethlisberger, the Pittsburgh Steelers’ QB, in a post camp workout said, “he wants to be a leader and a role model to kids.”

This quote was taken yesterday, on 19 April 2010.   Thanks Ben for waiting a few days after the lawyers decided not to press charges against you for your little escapades down in Georgia.

I’m sorry, but do these guys have any idea what they are saying here?  Does this stuff sell t-shirts, jerseys, hats or tickets?  Do these guys know what it means to be a leader or a role model?

Here is a short list of the guys you don’t want to be your kid’s role model.

Disclaimer: I made this list off the top of my head. I did not do any research before I compiled the list. That means I made this list from my memory of current events.  If I remember what these guys did, so will your kids. I imposed a time limit on myself of five minutes. I will not try to make the list longer, more complete or sensational.  This list is in no way conclusive. Feel free to add your favorite “role model.”  Please be advised all parties are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.  Some of the guys on the list have not committed a crime; they just had lapses in proper judgment.

Ben Roethlisberger

Ben Roethlisberger

Donte Stallworth

Donte Stallworth

Tiki Barber

Tiki Barber

Tiger Woods

Tiger Woods

Mike Vick

Mike Vick

Ricky Williams

Ricky Williams

Chad Ocho-Cinco

Chad Ocho-Cinco

Ray Lewis

Ray Lewis

Bill Belichick

Bill Belichick

Plaxico Burress

Plaxico Burress

The sad part is, if you are not a role model then, you guessed it…

By default these guys are.

A brief footnote.
Last year, the Steelers went 9-7.
Two games above mediocrity, nice.

Three Leadership Concepts the Top Fifty Companies Got Right, and You Can Too

We all need reminders of reasons why we don’t do things in life.  I just got two reminders in the same day, and both were my fault.

The first thing I was reminded of was the reason I can’t stand to read magazines about money or business.  The second reminder came as I read the March issue of Fortune magazine and some of the articles written about business leadership.  The magazine reminded me that most American businesses still do not get it.

I know what you are going to ask, no, I did not buy the magazine.  I am not that much a glutton for punishment.  Someone sent it to me in the mail as a gift.  I guess it was sent because of the cover photo of a G.I. and the leadership theme.  But, yes I am still reading it.

I know, I‘m the crazy one, because I expected something different from corporate America and their knowledge of and attitude toward leadership.  But, the good news is that some American and foreign companies are getting it.

Thankfully, in an issue that examines “The 50 Worlds Most Admired Companies” it seems the top 50 have a few common leadership traits.  They follow the most basic leadership principles.  Most of the fifty adhere to the Life Performance Institutes number one leadership concept; have a leadership policy of trust and integrity; and rely on the first aspect of the Warrior’s mentality.

By believing in and implementing the ultimate leadership concept, these companies find they can thrive in economic downturns and some become stronger. Keep in mind the LPI Ultimate Leadership Concept of:

“The two most important and basic elements of leadership.

The Mission:

First, define the mission, task or goal to be accomplished.  True leaders recognize the importance of clearly defining the mission and they understand the role of people in achieving that mission.

The People:

You must understand that goals are ultimately achieved by people.  This is critical to your success because they perform the tasks to achieve the mission.  Without your leadership support the people will fail… if your people fail, your mission will fail.  Your success as a leader is dependant on the success your people have in accomplishing the mission.”

http://lifeperformanceinstitute.com/category/21-leadership-lessons/

How fitting, the top 50 admired companies would follow the ultimate leadership concept and put their greatest asset first in times of trouble.  How fitting that investing in your greatest asset, your people, would pay the most dividends in economic turmoil.

Even Geoff Colvin who opined that the Most Admired “differ from the stragglers in at least one way: They actually believe what every company proclaims about people being their most valuable asset.”  How sad, even business journalists can see the disconnect between most managements and their employees. Maybe this study will change that.

It still is hard to believe that a lot of companies still see their employees as a liability or expense.  The fact is, most of this years winners increased benefits, pay and actively engaged employees on how to make their jobs and lives better.  There is no better way to win the loyalty and enthusiasm from employees than to show appreciation for their hard work in times of crisis.

The other driving force behind these industry leaders is keeping the long-term vision or focus of the company.  It’s hard enough to keep the ship going in the right direction during good times.  Making sure you are going in the right direction when you are flying into a storm is even more critical.  This year’s best ensured they kept their focus and redirected their energies into the core business.

The Hay Group, who completed the survey for Fortune magazine found this rang true in the best of the best.  “Tying all those facts together is one precept: Most Admired companies display a greater long-term focus than do their peers.”  The Hay Group’s Mark Royal said.

Trust was also a major factor in this year’s top 50.  Not only did the public have great confidence in the best companies products and services, but also the employees who provided those services were confident in their own management teams and their company’s long-term viability.

Remember, this trust was not built over night and was not built on weak managerial policies but on a strong foundation of leadership and trust that took years and sometimes decades to build.

“You can’t do it in a day or week or month. You do it one grain of sand at a time.  And you destroy it fast, but you build it slowly.” The CEO of the number three company on the list, Warren Buffet, told Fortune about the delicate relationship trust plays with the public.

Well, that is the good news. The problem is that it took so much time, effort and money to see the truth in the sea of poor management and failed policies. I’m still confused why it takes a consulting group and probably millions of dollars to figure out what should be the basics.

I’m glad corporate America is finally getting the point, and hiring American vets into management and leadership positions in the corporate world.  Maybe, next time, instead of paying for an expensive study, corporate leaders should first try asking any airman, soldier, or marine, strait out of boot camp or OTS the basics of leadership and save yourself quite a bit of time money and effort.

That is something you can add to your bottom line.

Let me know what you think.